Work-Related Repetitive
Strain Injury Treatment in a
Chiropractic
Office
A retrospective
analysis was performed on 222
work-related repetitive strain
injury (RSI) cases referred to our
office (Gregg J. Carb, D.C., C.A.E.
in San Francisco, CA) by a local
employer between 09/29/95 and
04/01/02 to determine the
effectiveness of our therapy
(Active Release Techniques or ART)
and patient education program
(posture and ergonomic awareness
training) in resolving these cases.
Males represented 56 (25%) of the
cases while females represented 166
(75%). Nearly
100% of the repetitive strain
injury cases involved computer data
entry.
The following
information was obtained from each
patient file and entered on a
spreadsheet:
-
Number of body parts
involved
-
Date of initial
consultation
-
Number of treatment
visits
-
Patient satisfaction
rating
-
Outcome risk factors
present
-
Number of outcome risk
factors
The span of
time between the date of
initial consultation and the
date of last treatment
reflected management of the
patient’s injury to the
initial resolution.
Some cases 36 (16%) did have
one or more recurrent
episodes requiring additional
care that was not included in
our analysis.
Therefore, the number of
treatment visits indicated
the number of therapy
sessions until initial
resolution, which in most
instances 186 (84%) was the
end of the case. The
final status was considered
to be the case standing at
initial resolution, or actual
final status (if known) in
those cases with recurrent
episodes. The
satisfaction rating was
requested by written
questionnaire from patients
we released at the conclusion
of their case. The
outcome risk factors we
tracked (on initial intake
forms) were self-reported,
present or past occurrences
of: high blood pressure,
headache, pre-menstrual
syndrome, high
stress/anxiety, sleep
disturbance, general fatigue,
chronic depressed mood, any
use of alcohol, any use of
tobacco.
FINAL STATUS
DATA:
Patients
formally released, with no
need for further care, were
referred to as
“Pre-Injury
Status.”
Patients not formally
released, but also with no
need for further care, were
referred to as
“Resolved
Pre-Injury.”
These cases combined numbered
166 (75%) and took an average
of seven treatment visits to
resolve.
Patients that
discontinued treatment at our
office, but who needed further
care elsewhere, were referred to
as “Discontinued
Care.”
We felt these cases represented
dissatisfied, unresolved
patients.
These cases numbered 21 (9%) and
had an average of eight
treatment visits before
dropping out of care.
Patients that
required medical consultation or
physical therapy referral for
case management were referred to
as “Referred.” These
cases numbered 16 (7%) and had
an average of seven and a half
treatment visits prior to being
referred out.
Patients that
reached a maximum level of
improvement with residual
permanent
disability/impairment were
referred to as “P&S
Status” (Permanent and
Stationary).
These cases numbered 15 (7%)
and had an average of
seventeen treatment visits
prior to reaching a P&S
status.
Patients that
relocated out of the area
during care were referred to
as “Relocated.”
These cases numbered 5
(2%).
OUTCOME RISK
FACTORS DATA:
Of all 222
cases, those
reporting:
Alcohol Use =
78 (35%)
Depression =
27 (12%)
PMS = 23 (14%
of females)
high Stress
levels = 56
(25%)
Tobacco Use =
45 (20%)
The average
number of outcome risk factors
per case =
1.98.
We compared
the outcome risk factors for all
records to the outcome risk
factors for cases that
discontinued
care.
Alcohol
Use:
52% Discontinued Care vs. 35%
all records
Depression:
29% Discontinued Care vs. 12%
all records
PMS
(females):
27%
Discontinued Care vs. 14% all
records
high
Stress:
33% Discontinued Care vs. 25%
all records
Tobacco
Use:
43% Discontinued Care vs. 20%
all records
PATIENT
SATISFACTION
The number of
cases that returned our patient
satisfaction questionnaire = 127
(57%). The
average patient satisfaction =
9.3 (1-10 scale).
SUMMARY OF
DATA
We
retroactively analyzed the
case status and outcome risk
factors on 222 work-related
RSI cases referred to our
chiropractic office from a
local
employer.
A total of 166 (75%) cases
were resolved in an average
of seven treatment visits
using our therapy (Active
Release Techniques) and
patient education program
(posture and ergonomic
awareness
training).
There were 21 (9%) cases that
discontinued care after an
average of eight treatment
visits. In
comparing outcome risk
factors for our unsuccessful
cases (discontinued care
group) with all cases, a
significant difference was
apparent.
The cases that dropped out of
care had a greater tobacco
use (by >100%), alcohol
use, depression (by
>100%), PMS (by ~100%),
and stress, as well a greater
average number of outcome
risk factors (by
50%).
We conclude
that this data suggests that
variables such as the outcome
risk factors we tracked can
negatively affect a
patient’s recovery from
a work-related
injury.
Tracking such variables from
the onset of a case may help
to identify patients at risk
for a poor
outcome.
Also, the number of cases
that did resolve under our
therapy and patient education
program, without the need for
referral, without residual
permanent disability /
impairment, and in a
workers’ compensation
setting, demonstrates the
effectiveness of a
therapeutic approach based in
part on the posture
principles described in
The Science of Sitting
Made Simple.